To a large extent, the tenets of the micro sociological theory are similar to the phenomenological philosophy. This therefore means that they do not rely on the empirical and statistical observations. In essence, the micro sociological theory bases its arguments on interpretative analysis. This, in most cases, represents the face-to-face analysis. For instance, trying to understand an individual’s reaction over some policy without taking into consideration what other members of the society may feel entails micro sociology. Micro sociological theories of sociology, in most cases, are based on the nature of day-to-day social interactions of the human beings on small scale. This is unlike the journalistic arguments that do not have a background on their assertions. Although not always perfect, the social science theorizing represents the better option when studying sociology and the expected behaviors. When this is done, it becomes easy to predict what the likely event is or what can be expected from a certain trend. This is achieved through constant analyzing of some situations and marking out the trends that follow. For instance, their arguments are purely based on research and the predictability of certain norms and traits in behavior. Social science theorizing takes many characteristics. Social science theories have evidences to back their arguments (Eisenstadt, 2005).Īs already argued above, social science theorizing greatly differs from journalistic arguments. This is very different from what social science theories propose. The evidence that they rely on is not proven, and as such, they depend on anecdotal and ideological evidence. Largely, the journalistic arguments lack familiarity when it comes to the literature of the issue under discussion. This means that these theories can prove a given argument using some form of evidence or explanation. In most cases, social science theories are based on some empirical research and there is evidence for a given argument. This is contrary to what social science advocates for. Their arguments have no proper background and it would present difficulties in proving claims. For instance, journalistic arguments, more often than not, tend to adopt the knockdown arguments. The large number of differences that can be deduced between the two is an evidence of this. In practice, social science theorizing largely contradicts journalistic arguments. In most cases, the theories that use the normative positions critique the aspects that are present in the traditional and conventional thought. In contrast to the theories that stress on the scientific methodologies, other theories, largely, stick to the normative positions. In doing so, they employ the form of objectivity. For instance, some of the theories strictly stick to scientific methodologies of analysis. In current practice, the social theories take a different nature. In doing so, the theories also concentrate on the primacy of the arguments, either through the agency or through the structure, they take. In most cases, the social theories often relate to the debates of the historical nature in determining the validity of arguments depending on the methodologies. In most cases, these social theories are used by social scientists in their day-to-day activities to provide a unique explanation of the events of the world. In essence, the social theories are a form of empirical evidence that sociologists use and apply in their efforts to interpret various phenomena in the social world. As such, there are several social theories that play a significant role in influencing the perspective that a person may adopt over a certain issue. The study and practice of sociology is very wide and entails a lot of aspects.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |